Massachusetts lawmakers call for action as Supreme Court reconsiders Roe V. Wade – CBS Boston



BOSTON (CBS / AP) – The six Conservative Supreme Court justices, hear the biggest challenge to abortion rights in decades, said they would uphold a Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

The conservative majority in the nine-member tribunal said on Wednesday it would allow states to ban abortion much earlier in pregnancy and could even overturn national law that has been in existence for nearly 50 years.

READ MORE: Car crashes into swimming pool in Norwood

With hundreds of protesters outside chanting for and against, the judges led arguments that could decide the fate of the landmark 1973 court ruling Roe v. Wade legalizing abortion in the United States and his 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, who reaffirmed Roe.

The result will probably not be known until next June. But after nearly two hours of argument, the six Tory judges, including three appointed by former President Donald Trump, have indicated they will uphold Mississippi law. At the very least, such a move would undermine Roe and Casey, who allow states to regulate but not ban abortion to the point of fetal viability, at around 24 weeks.

Massachusetts lawmakers, who expanded access to abortion in 2020, came out strongly in support of the right to abortion on Wednesday.

“Abortion is essential. Period ”, Representative Ayanna Pressley of Boston tweeted.

Deputy House Speaker Katherine Clark said the fight for abortion rights “has reached a breaking point.”

“Congress must pass the Women’s Health Protection Act to protect the constitutional right to abortion and ensure that all people have the freedom to control their own bodies,” she said. “We will never back down in this fundamental fight for our rights. “

Senators Ed Markey and Elizabeth Warren both support an end to filibustering in order to pass pro-abortion legislation through Congress.

“One by one, the Republican-appointed judges went to the Senate and promised to respect precedent. They would respect the established law. Well, Roe v. Wade has been law for almost 50 years. So let’s see this respect. But we can’t wait, we have to #EndTheFilibuster to be able to codify Roe ”, Warren tweeted.

Markey also called for adding more Supreme Court justices to counter a Tory majority.

“Ultimately, to eliminate dangerous partisanship and restore balance, we must expand the United States Supreme Court,” he said in a statement.

There was substantial support among the Tory judges to get rid of Roe and Casey altogether. Judge Clarence Thomas is the only member of the court to openly request that the two cases be quashed.

Trump-appointed Judge Brett Kavanaugh asked if the court would do better to withdraw from the abortion issue entirely and let states decide.

“Why should this court be the arbiter rather than Congress, state legislatures, state supreme courts, the people being able to resolve this issue?” Kavanaugh asked. “And there will be different answers in Mississippi and New York, different answers in Alabama than in California.”

Abortion would soon become illegal or severely restricted in about half of the states if Roe and Casey were canceled, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research body that supports abortion rights. The legislatures of many Republican-led states are prepared to act on the Supreme Court’s ruling. On Wednesday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned earlier rulings that had blocked a Tennessee law that included a ban on abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected – around six weeks – and ordered a new court hearing.

People of color and of modest means would be disproportionately affected, advocates of abortion rights say.

All three of the court’s liberal justices said reversing Roe and Casey would significantly damage the court’s legitimacy.

“Will this institution survive the stench that this creates in the public perception that the Constitution and its reading are only political acts?” Asked Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

In unusually strong terms for an argument in a high court, Judge Stephen Breyer warned his colleagues that they “better be sure” before dismissing established abortion decisions.

Opinion polls show support for preserving Roe, although some surveys also find support for greater restrictions on abortion.

Among conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts appeared most interested in a less drastic move that would uphold Mississippi law but not explicitly overturn Roe and Casey.

READ MORE: 73-year-old woman killed by heartwarming animal on Cultivate Care farms in Bolton

“Maybe that’s what they’re asking for, but the issue we have before us today is 15 weeks,” said Roberts, alluding to Mississippi’s call to quash the larger cases in addition to enforce their own law.

More than 90% of abortions are performed in the first 13 weeks of pregnancy, well before viability, according to the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

About 100 patients per year have an abortion after 15 weeks at the Jackson Women’s Health Organization, Mississippi’s only abortion clinic. The facility does not offer abortions after 16 weeks.

Even maintaining the 15-week ban would mean rejecting the decades-old viability line. Abortion rights supporters say it would effectively overthrow Roe and leave no policy line as to when abortions could be banned.

Judge Neil Gorsuch, another person appointed by Trump, has suggested that the lack of a hard-hitting alternative could be a reason for overturning Roe and Casey entirely.

“You pointed out that if 15 weeks were approved, we would have cases out of 12 and 10 and 8 and 6, and so my question is, is there a line in there that the government thinks would be justified or no, “asked Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, the lawyer for the Biden administration supporting the Mississippi clinic.

“I don’t think there is a line that could be more principled than sustainability,” Prelogar said.

Supporters on both sides in the abortion debate filled the sidewalk and street outside the courthouse, their dueling rallies audible even from inside the building. Opposite signs read such sentiments as “His body, his choice” and “God hates the shedding of innocent blood.” The court stepped up security measures, including closing some streets around the building.

Perhaps in recognition of the gravity of the matter before them, the judges took the bench at 10 a.m. without any smiles or the private jokes they sometimes share.

The case went to a Conservative 6-3 majority court that was turned by judges appointed by Trump – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

A month ago, judges also heard arguments over a uniquely designed Texas law that successfully circumvented the Roe and Casey decisions and banned abortions in the nation’s second largest state after about six weeks of pregnancy. The legal dispute over Texas law revolves around whether it can be challenged in federal court, rather than over the right to an abortion.

The court has yet to rule on the Texas law, and judges have refused to stay it while the case is under legal review.

The Mississippi case poses more central questions to abortion rights. State Attorney General Scott Stewart said Roe and Casey “haunt our country” and “have no basis in the Constitution.”

He compared these decisions to Plessy v. Ferguson, the infamous 1896 Supreme Court decision that justified official segregation before it was overturned by Brown v. Board of Education 58 years later.

“We are running on 50 years of Roe. It is a totally wrong decision which has inflicted enormous damage on our country and will continue to do so and will take countless human lives unless and until this court overturns it, ”he said. declared.

The Mississippi Clinic argued that these two cases were properly disposed of and on which women and their partners have relied for nearly half a century, a point also raised by Judge Elena Kagan.

Abortion decisions are “part of the fabric of women’s existence in this country,” she said.

Barrett approached the issue of women’s dependence on abortion decisions from a different perspective. She suggested that so-called safe haven laws in all 50 states that allow mothers to give up parental rights mean that women cannot be forced into mothers, which could limit employment and other opportunities.

“Why aren’t the shelter laws addressing this problem?” ” she asked.

Barrett, with a long history of personal opposition to abortion, acknowledged that the court has yet to deal with the issue of forcing women to remain pregnant against their will.

She described such a pregnancy as “an impairment of bodily autonomy, you know, that we have in other settings, like vaccines.”

NO MORE NEWS: Governor Charlie Baker weighing $ 4 billion bill sent to him by lawmakers

(© Copyright 2021 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All rights reserved. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)



Previous The essential vegan guide to Starbucks vacation drinks
Next How to keep your blog running while you are away